Zorglon ZORGLONEngineering · AI · Monitoring
FR

Case studies

We do not describe what we could do. We describe what we know how to build.

Under confidentiality agreements, our work is presented by nature, by problem and by result — never by client name.

01 — Our work

Four systems, four real contexts

Projects for small and mid-sized businesses across Europe, built end to end: scoping, development, go-live and operations.

Software vendor · 60-employee SME

Specialised ERP/CRM

Challenge — Three separate tools, a pivot spreadsheet and two full-time people just to run quotes, deals and invoicing.

  • A single ERP/CRM covering offer, quote, deal, invoicing and client portal
  • End-to-end automation, from signed quote to unpaid-invoice reminder
  • Elimination of the pivot spreadsheet and double entry
−78 %processing time
4×volume per employee

Managed services · multi-site fleet

Monitoring console and deployed execution agents

Challenge — A heterogeneous fleet, incidents reported by users, no consolidated view of machine health.

  • Unified monitoring console with real-time streams and usable history
  • Agents deployed across the fleet, tooled and remotely operated
  • Automatic detection, qualification and execution of operational procedures
99.95 %target availability
< 15 mincritical response

Technical services · operations management

Document assistant built on your own documents

Challenge — Dense, scattered documentation and a team losing hours finding the right technical procedure.

  • Private knowledge base covering procedures, contracts and history
  • Sourced answers linking to the exact passage in the original document
  • European deployment, with no data transfer outside the EU
×3resolution speed
−62 %expert requests

Technology management · software vendor

Model gateway and guardrails

Challenge — Uncontrolled model calls, unpredictable costs, no usage traceability and no quality evaluation.

  • Single multi-model gateway with relevance-based routing
  • Budget caps per team and per use case
  • Complete journal of usage, latency and spend
−54 %monthly AI cost
100 %calls traced

Industrial maintenance · 90-employee SME

Fleet monitoring and preventive maintenance

Challenge — Production stoppages caused by ageing IT equipment, with no wear indicator and no replacement plan.

  • Monitoring of workstations, servers and network equipment across three sites
  • Replacement plan spread over eighteen months
  • Preventive maintenance scheduled outside working hours
−91 %unplanned stoppages
3sites covered

Consulting firm · 40 consultants

Back-office automation

Challenge — Invoicing, expenses and reporting produced manually at the end of every month by the admin team.

  • Automated billing cycle and reminders
  • Automatic consolidation of activity indicators
  • Three admin production days saved every month
−82 %admin time
D+2monthly close

02 — Results

Gains your teams notice in the first month

  • −78 %processing time on automated processes
  • ×3delivery speed before go-live
  • −54 %AI cost after introducing a gateway
  • −91 %unplanned stoppages on monitored fleets

Gains typically observed on comparable projects.

Does your context look like one of these projects?

Tell us your situation in a few lines: we will say plainly whether we are the right partner, and where to start.

Describe my project